Recently we received a mockup for a website from a client that makes extensive use of the font all over the layout for menu items, articles titles, block titles, etc. I never heard of that font before and I assumed that it wasn't web safe, also I checked online in several places to confirm this, like and, but couldn't find any reference to this font. So after telling to the designers that we are going to need to use some kind of text replacement technique for using this font they told us that this is, indeed, a web safe font and that they checked in Windows and Mac and the font is installed. So we are going to use this font but I'm still curious if this is a standard font or it's installed with an Adobe product or any other application. Does anyone have any info on this? As others have stated, Rockwell is not a websafe font.

I, for example, am typing this on a perfectly ordinary Windows box and don't have it. It is installed with certain versions of Office. The current accepted answer recommends using a proper CSS font stack to feed Rockwell to visitors that have it, and more-common-but-less-suitable fonts to those without. That's excellent advice, so do so. However, you can actually do one better. All of the modern non-IE browsers either support CSS Webfonts now or will in their next release. This module lets you host fonts on your server and transparently feed it to visitors when they visit, allowing you to use a vast array of fonts that aren't dependably available.

Go ahead and add Webfont support now for Rockwell, giving it as the second choice in the font stack (behind ordinary Rockwell). This will allow visitors who are using advanced browsers but don't have Rockwell installed to still get the full effect of your typography, while allowing visitors with lesser browsers to still gracefully degrade to another font. Finally, if you really need to hit IE with the font, go with image replacement.

We have 1 free rockwell fonts to offer for direct downloading 1001 Fonts is your favorite site for free fonts since 2001.

SIFR is always an option, but it can really slow down a page, especially if you use a lot of it. I'm the developer of, which is an unobtrusive and super-lightweight javascript-based image replacer that uses a PHP backend to generate the images. It grabs all relevant information from the CSS directly, and can even handle word-wrapping automatically. There is also a FastCGI backend in development by one of my users. PIR generates 32-bit PNGs, so it can deliver full transparency (it'll even make the font itself transparent if the visitor is using a browser that knows how to handle transparent colors). I have Mac OS 10.5.6 (Leopard) with all updates to date and have no such font on my system.

I also have a fresh install of Windows XP on a virtual machine, no sign of Rockwell there either. Nikkormat Ft Serial Numbers more. Sport Psychology For Coaches Ebook3000 more. I think your designers just want to avoid further work. Resident Evil 5 Ps3 Download Torrent Ita more. I've never heard of Rockwell before 'Sketch Rockwell' was featured in Smashing Magazine a couple of months ago. I'd go for sIFR, too, especially if you use the font in sizes larger than 16. It's not only about not having the font, but browsers running on Windows don't antialias fonts and that makes them look terrible at larger sizes.

You can find.